Rating Collective Humanity

CIS and WIS Scores

To properly evaluate collective humanity using the Consciousness Identity Spectrum (CIS) and the Wellness Impact Score (WIS), we must treat each measure independently. The CIS measures the level of consciousness or intent, focusing purely on mental or spiritual alignment, while the WIS measures the actual impact of actions on global well-being—whether those actions are positive or negative, regardless of intention.

Collective Humanity’s CIS Score: -3 to -5

On the Consciousness Identity Spectrum, humanity as a collective falls between -3 to -5. This range represents basic self-centeredness to ego-driven selfishness. While there are individuals and groups demonstrating higher levels of consciousness, most global systems and societal behaviors are largely ego-driven, materialistic, and self-centered. Here’s why:

1. Basic Self-Centeredness (-3 to -1):

• Many people across the world focus on meeting their own needs with minimal regard for the collective good. While they may not actively harm others, their empathy is often limited to personal circles or what directly benefits them.

• Example: Consumerism and materialism remain dominant in global cultures. People tend to prioritize personal success, wealth, and convenience (e.g., fast fashion, excessive waste), often without considering the broader implications for the environment or future generations. This represents a low level of consciousness, as the focus is on immediate self-gratification over long-term, collective well-being.

2. Ego-Driven Selfishness (-5 to -4):

• Systems of capitalism, corporate power, and political exploitation drive much of the world’s behavior. These systems often operate at the expense of marginalized communities, the environment, and even future generations, reflecting collective ego and a lack of true compassion.

• Example: The global wealth gap continues to widen. The top 1% controls a vast majority of the world’s resources, while billions live in poverty. The pursuit of profit by large corporations, often at the expense of workers’ rights and environmental health, shows the predominance of ego-driven behavior. This demonstrates a failure to see the interconnectedness of all beings, typical of lower consciousness.

Why This Score:

• Humanity’s collective CIS score is lower because the majority of decision-making is still rooted in survival instincts, self-interest, and material desires. Even when empathy exists, it’s often transactional and does not extend far beyond immediate concerns.

Collective Humanity’s WIS Score: -3 to -4

On the Wellness Impact Score, humanity’s collective impact on global well-being is negative, falling between -3 to -4. This score reflects significant harm caused by humanity’s actions, including environmental degradation, inequality, and exploitation of animals and natural resources.

1. Environmental Destruction (-4 to -5):

• Human industrial activities, such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change, have led to widespread destruction of ecosystems and biodiversity. This negative impact affects not only the planet but also the well-being of future generations.

• Example: The ongoing deforestation of the Amazon rainforest to clear land for cattle farming and agriculture is contributing to climate change, biodiversity loss, and the displacement of indigenous communities. This type of large-scale destruction demonstrates humanity’s overall negative impact on the environment.

2. Animal Exploitation (-4):

• The treatment of animals in industrial farming is a major contributor to both environmental harm and unnecessary suffering. Billions of animals are kept in cruel conditions for food production, with little consideration for their well-being.

• Example: Factory farming, which keeps animals in crowded, unsanitary conditions, contributes to methane emissions, environmental pollution, and animal cruelty. Despite growing awareness of these issues, the global demand for cheap meat products continues to drive this practice.

3. Social and Economic Inequality (-3 to -4):

• Global systems of inequality, driven by economic and political structures, result in vast disparities in quality of life. While some benefit from immense wealth, many suffer from lack of access to basic needs like food, clean water, and healthcare.

• Example: The global wealth inequality issue is highlighted by the fact that more than 700 million people still live in extreme poverty, while the world’s wealthiest individuals continue to accumulate massive fortunes. This imbalance results in widespread human suffering, preventable diseases, and shortened life expectancies in poorer nations.

4. Positive Contributions (+1 to +2):

• While the overall impact of humanity is negative, there are also movements toward sustainability, human rights, and social justice that make positive contributions. Humanitarian efforts, technological innovations, and grassroots environmental movements mitigate some of the harm.

• Example: Renewable energy efforts, such as the rise of solar and wind power, represent humanity’s steps toward reducing dependence on fossil fuels and mitigating climate change. However, these efforts are not yet widespread enough to offset the ongoing destruction.

Why This Score:

• The WIS score for humanity is negative due to the ongoing environmental harm, animal exploitation, and systemic inequality that continues to dominate the global landscape. While there are positive movements, these are outweighed by the scale of the harm caused.

Conclusion: Humanity’s CIS and WIS Scores

CIS Score: -3 to -5Humanity’s collective consciousness is still predominantly self-centered and ego-driven, with behaviors and systems that prioritize personal gain over collective well-being. The score reflects a low level of consciousness, characterized by self-interest and materialism, but not absolute malice or complete detachment from empathy.

WIS Score: -3 to -4Despite some positive efforts, humanity’s net impact on global wellness remains negative, driven by environmental destruction, animal exploitation, and social inequality. While there are notable movements toward sustainability and justice, the overall harm caused by human actions results in a negative WIS score.

These scores, assessed independently, show that while humanity's intentions are often self-centered (reflected in the CIS), the actual impact of its actions (reflected in the WIS) is overwhelmingly negative, despite positive pockets of change. To improve both scores, humanity must raise its collective consciousness and implement systemic changes that align intention with the greater good for all beings and the planet.